All that is good and bad about Sreesanth's spunk epitomises this new Kerala. He does occasionally come across as shallow and sophomoric but that shouldn't detract from the kind of triumph he is constantly seeking over, yes, himself. I
t's there in the obsessed mumbling as he goes up to his bowling mark, the comic calming-down mime that he practices, the ritual gestures as he steps on to the field or takes a wicket, the aggression that he dredges up as witnessed in that patented war dance after slogging Andre Nel for a six: to outsiders, all these may border on the grotesque, but anyone with any inkling of what the weight of inherited attitudes can be will realise that he is trying to educate himself into more liberal convictions.
So how do the two Sreesanths square with each other
I am wondering what the bottom two paragraphs mean?
Can you explain this paragraph?virus scan
They are both verbose but both are about maturity, coming of age and accepting growth through seeing yourself more honestly.
Par. #1) Seeking himself through recognition and honest self-evaluation to overcome his sophomoric (youthful) behavior.
Par. #2) The desription of sophomoric behavior, sometimes odd to the point of being grotesque but at the most important level educating himself through the events and growing in understanding (convictions)
Now - compare and contrast them from the above summaries.
